1 files changed, 0 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch b/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index b7ac4d94c..000000000
--- a/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
-To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
-Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
-Subject: Re: drivers/ata/pata_artop.c
-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:25:16 -0400
-User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
-
-On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:18:31PM +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
->  In the discovery phase there's a lot of time spent in the detection
->  of the second port.  
-
-The error recovery is a bit determined right now - Tejun's been doing some
-work on SRST behaviour and also for the worst cases polled detect so it
-should come out ok
-
->  What's the correct way to inform the driver
->  to avoid checking the second port?  
-
-Set the number of ports to 1 in your own tree for now. The real fix is
-not to go poking at pata ports if the ret is 0xFF
-
----
- drivers/ata/pata_artop.c |    6 ++++++
- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
-
-Index: linux-2.6.19/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c
-===================================================================
---- linux-2.6.19.orig/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c
-+++ linux-2.6.19/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c
-@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
- #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
- #include <linux/libata.h>
- #include <linux/ata.h>
-+#include <asm/mach-types.h>
- 
- #define DRV_NAME	"pata_artop"
- #define DRV_VERSION	"0.4.2"
-@@ -469,6 +470,11 @@ static int artop_init_one (struct pci_de
- 		pci_read_config_byte(pdev, 0x4a, &reg);
- 		pci_write_config_byte(pdev, 0x4a, (reg & ~0x01) | 0x80);
- 
-+		/* NAS100D workaround */
-+#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_NAS100D
-+		if (machine_is_nas100d())
-+			ports = 1;
-+#endif
- 	}
- 
- 	BUG_ON(info == NULL);