summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.25/961-backport_gpio_define_gpio_valid.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.25/961-backport_gpio_define_gpio_valid.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.25/961-backport_gpio_define_gpio_valid.patch136
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.25/961-backport_gpio_define_gpio_valid.patch b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.25/961-backport_gpio_define_gpio_valid.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2e826d43f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.25/961-backport_gpio_define_gpio_valid.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
+Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:14:46 +0000 (-0700)
+Subject: gpio: define gpio_is_valid()
+X-Git-Tag: v2.6.26-rc1~849
+X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=e6de1808f8ebfeb7e49f3c5a30cb8f2032beb287
+
+gpio: define gpio_is_valid()
+
+Introduce a gpio_is_valid() predicate; use it in gpiolib.
+
+Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
+ [ use inline function; follow the gpio_* naming convention;
+ work without gpiolib; all programming interfaces need docs ]
+Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+---
+
+diff --git a/Documentation/gpio.txt b/Documentation/gpio.txt
+index 5463009..c35ca9e 100644
+--- a/Documentation/gpio.txt
++++ b/Documentation/gpio.txt
+@@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ type of GPIO controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA.
+ The numbers need not be contiguous; either of those platforms could also
+ use numbers 2000-2063 to identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders.
+
++If you want to initialize a structure with an invalid GPIO number, use
++some negative number (perhaps "-EINVAL"); that will never be valid. To
++test if a number could reference a GPIO, you may use this predicate:
++
++ int gpio_is_valid(int number);
++
++A number that's not valid will be rejected by calls which may request
++or free GPIOs (see below). Other numbers may also be rejected; for
++example, a number might be valid but unused on a given board.
++
+ Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is currently a
+ platform-specific implementation issue.
+
+diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+index eb75d12..623fcd9 100644
+--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
++++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
+ * dynamic allocation. We don't currently support that.
+ */
+
+- if (chip->base < 0 || (chip->base + chip->ngpio) >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS) {
++ if (chip->base < 0 || !gpio_is_valid(chip->base + chip->ngpio)) {
+ status = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
+
+- if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
++ if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
+ goto done;
+ desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+ if (desc->chip == NULL)
+@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
+
+- if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS) {
++ if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
+ WARN_ON(extra_checks);
+ return;
+ }
+@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ const char *gpiochip_is_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+ {
+ unsigned gpio = chip->base + offset;
+
+- if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS || gpio_desc[gpio].chip != chip)
++ if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio) || gpio_desc[gpio].chip != chip)
+ return NULL;
+ if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gpio_desc[gpio].flags) == 0)
+ return NULL;
+@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
+
+- if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
++ if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
+ goto fail;
+ chip = desc->chip;
+ if (!chip || !chip->get || !chip->direction_input)
+@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
+
+- if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
++ if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
+ goto fail;
+ chip = desc->chip;
+ if (!chip || !chip->set || !chip->direction_output)
+@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static int gpiolib_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
+
+ /* REVISIT this isn't locked against gpio_chip removal ... */
+
+- for (gpio = 0; gpio < ARCH_NR_GPIOS; gpio++) {
++ for (gpio = 0; gpio_is_valid(gpio); gpio++) {
+ if (chip == gpio_desc[gpio].chip)
+ continue;
+ chip = gpio_desc[gpio].chip;
+diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
+index 7e77b6f..464c5b3 100644
+--- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
++++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
+@@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
+ #define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 256
+ #endif
+
++static inline int gpio_is_valid(int number)
++{
++ /* only some non-negative numbers are valid */
++ return ((unsigned)number) < ARCH_NR_GPIOS;
++}
++
+ struct seq_file;
+ struct module;
+
+@@ -99,6 +105,12 @@ extern int __gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio);
+
+ #else
+
++static inline int gpio_is_valid(int number)
++{
++ /* only non-negative numbers are valid */
++ return number >= 0;
++}
++
+ /* platforms that don't directly support access to GPIOs through I2C, SPI,
+ * or other blocking infrastructure can use these wrappers.
+ */