rtl819xx - Realtek rtl819xx port to OpenWrt

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
...
*	kernel: update ssb and bcma to linux-next next-20110628	hauke	2011-06-28	2	-3/+34
\| \| \| \|	git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@27299 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
*	kernel: update ssb and bcma to linux-next next-20110627	hauke	2011-06-27	2	-0/+684
\| \| \| \|	git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@27293 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
*	kernel: refresh patches for kernel 3.0-rc4	hauke	2011-06-21	13	-14/+14
\| \| \| \|	git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@27247 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
*	[PATCH] generic: Remove IPv6 depependency of bridge in 2.6.38+	jow	2011-06-19	1	-0/+101
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Since 2.6.38 the bridge module has a dependency to IPv6 if IPv6 is enabled. Since the IPv6 module isn't exactly lightweight and bridge also only needs a single function from IPv6, it's rather easy to create a common "lib" module with a RCU pointer to the actual implementation, if the IPv6 module is loaded (although slightly hackish). The codepath seems to be only taken when using IPv6, so there should be no negative side effects when IPv6 isn't loaded. I did not measure how big the performance impact is. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski+openwrt@gmail.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@27237 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
*	linux/generic: Add support for 3.0-rc3	hauke	2011-06-15	107	-0/+59322
	Also make linux identify itself properly as 3.0, not 3.0.0. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski+openwrt@gmail.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@27191 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73