| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Tomas Kopal <Tomas.Kopal@altap.cz>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@17433 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@15878 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@15242 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
$(TARGET_LDFLAGS) when appropriate
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@14651 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@11472 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
|
|
This is the bcm57xx package. I have tested default vlan functions,
but I dont have the equipment to test more advanced setups. The default
vlan setup seems to be working fine. I also added the activate_gpio
parameter which will make the driver activate the switch via gpio before
probing for it.
I'm not sure which method is best for autoload. For the wrt350n, I
need the activate_gpio parameter. But its probably not a good idea
to add that to the autoload file. On a system without a bcm57xx switch,
isn't it a bad idea to mess with the gpios looking for the switch? Ideally,
wouldn't it be best to load the bcm57xx module from broadcom-diag, after
it has determined which router its on? I tried using 'request_module' from
there, but had no success. For now, I am relying on preinit to load
the bcm57xx module with activate_gpio param, after it has failed to load
switch_robo and switch_adm.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfountz <netprince (at) vt (dot) edu>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@11471 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
