diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'openwrt/toolchain/gdb/patches/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | openwrt/toolchain/gdb/patches/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch | 464 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 464 deletions
diff --git a/openwrt/toolchain/gdb/patches/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch b/openwrt/toolchain/gdb/patches/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 666d34342..000000000 --- a/openwrt/toolchain/gdb/patches/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,464 +0,0 @@ -This patch needs to be submitted for the FSF. Also, there may be testcases -already in the GDB testsuite (currently disabled) that it would probably fix. - -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/infcall.c -=================================================================== ---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/infcall.c 2004-10-08 04:15:56.000000000 -0400 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/infcall.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500 -@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ - #include "gdb_string.h" - #include "infcall.h" - #include "dummy-frame.h" -+#include "cp-abi.h" - - /* NOTE: cagney/2003-04-16: What's the future of this code? - -@@ -297,8 +298,8 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun - { - CORE_ADDR sp; - CORE_ADDR dummy_addr; -- struct type *value_type; -- unsigned char struct_return; -+ struct type *value_type, *target_value_type; -+ unsigned char struct_return = 0, cp_struct_return = 0; - CORE_ADDR struct_addr = 0; - struct regcache *retbuf; - struct cleanup *retbuf_cleanup; -@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun - struct regcache *caller_regcache; - struct cleanup *caller_regcache_cleanup; - struct frame_id dummy_id; -+ struct cleanup *args_cleanup; - - if (!target_has_execution) - noprocess (); -@@ -410,10 +412,31 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun - using_gcc = (b == NULL ? 2 : BLOCK_GCC_COMPILED (b)); - } - -- /* Are we returning a value using a structure return or a normal -- value return? */ -+ /* Are we returning a value using a structure return (passing a -+ hidden argument pointing to storage) or a normal value return? -+ There are two cases: C++ ABI mandated structure return and -+ target ABI structure return. The variable STRUCT_RETURN only -+ describes the latter. The C++ version is handled by passing -+ the return location as the first parameter to the function, -+ even preceding "this". This is different from the target -+ ABI version, which is target-specific; for instance, on ia64 -+ the first argument is passed in out0 but the hidden structure -+ return pointer would normally be passed in r8. */ - -- struct_return = using_struct_return (value_type, using_gcc); -+ if (current_language->la_language == language_cplus -+ && cp_pass_by_reference (value_type)) -+ { -+ cp_struct_return = 1; -+ -+ /* Tell the target specific argument pushing routine not to -+ expect a value. */ -+ target_value_type = builtin_type_void; -+ } -+ else -+ { -+ struct_return = using_struct_return (value_type, using_gcc); -+ target_value_type = value_type; -+ } - - /* Determine the location of the breakpoint (and possibly other - stuff) that the called function will return to. The SPARC, for a -@@ -432,7 +455,7 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun - if (INNER_THAN (1, 2)) - { - sp = push_dummy_code (current_gdbarch, sp, funaddr, -- using_gcc, args, nargs, value_type, -+ using_gcc, args, nargs, target_value_type, - &real_pc, &bp_addr); - dummy_addr = sp; - } -@@ -440,7 +463,7 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun - { - dummy_addr = sp; - sp = push_dummy_code (current_gdbarch, sp, funaddr, -- using_gcc, args, nargs, value_type, -+ using_gcc, args, nargs, target_value_type, - &real_pc, &bp_addr); - } - break; -@@ -507,9 +530,15 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun - param_type = TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (ftype, i); - else - param_type = NULL; -- -+ - args[i] = value_arg_coerce (args[i], param_type, prototyped); - -+ /* FIXME: Is current_language the right language? */ -+ if (current_language->la_language == language_cplus -+ && param_type != NULL -+ && cp_pass_by_reference (param_type)) -+ args[i] = value_addr (args[i]); -+ - /* elz: this code is to handle the case in which the function - to be called has a pointer to function as parameter and the - corresponding actual argument is the address of a function -@@ -607,7 +636,7 @@ You must use a pointer to function type - stack, if necessary. Make certain that the value is correctly - aligned. */ - -- if (struct_return) -+ if (struct_return || cp_struct_return) - { - int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type); - if (INNER_THAN (1, 2)) -@@ -632,6 +661,22 @@ You must use a pointer to function type - } - } - -+ if (cp_struct_return) -+ { -+ struct value **new_args; -+ -+ /* Add the new argument to the front of the argument list. */ -+ new_args = xmalloc (sizeof (struct value *) * (nargs + 1)); -+ new_args[0] = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type), -+ struct_addr); -+ memcpy (&new_args[1], &args[0], sizeof (struct value *) * nargs); -+ args = new_args; -+ nargs++; -+ args_cleanup = make_cleanup (xfree, args); -+ } -+ else -+ args_cleanup = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL); -+ - /* Create the dummy stack frame. Pass in the call dummy address as, - presumably, the ABI code knows where, in the call dummy, the - return address should be pointed. */ -@@ -649,6 +694,8 @@ You must use a pointer to function type - else - error ("This target does not support function calls"); - -+ do_cleanups (args_cleanup); -+ - /* Set up a frame ID for the dummy frame so we can pass it to - set_momentary_breakpoint. We need to give the breakpoint a frame - ID so that the breakpoint code can correctly re-identify the -@@ -839,11 +886,7 @@ the function call).", name); - /* Figure out the value returned by the function, return that. */ - { - struct value *retval; -- if (TYPE_CODE (value_type) == TYPE_CODE_VOID) -- /* If the function returns void, don't bother fetching the -- return value. */ -- retval = allocate_value (value_type); -- else if (struct_return) -+ if (struct_return || cp_struct_return) - /* NOTE: cagney/2003-09-27: This assumes that PUSH_DUMMY_CALL - has correctly stored STRUCT_ADDR in the target. In the past - that hasn't been the case, the old MIPS PUSH_ARGUMENTS -@@ -853,6 +896,10 @@ the function call).", name); - "struct return convention", check that PUSH_DUMMY_CALL isn't - playing tricks. */ - retval = value_at (value_type, struct_addr, NULL); -+ else if (TYPE_CODE (value_type) == TYPE_CODE_VOID) -+ /* If the function returns void, don't bother fetching the -+ return value. */ -+ retval = allocate_value (value_type); - else - { - /* This code only handles "register convention". */ -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.h -=================================================================== ---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/cp-abi.h 2003-04-12 13:41:25.000000000 -0400 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.h 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500 -@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ - /* Abstraction of various C++ ABI's we support, and the info we need - to get from them. - Contributed by Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com> -- Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - - This file is part of GDB. - -@@ -145,6 +145,10 @@ extern struct type *value_rtti_type (str - extern int baseclass_offset (struct type *type, int index, char *valaddr, - CORE_ADDR address); - -+/* Return non-zero if an argument of type TYPE should be passed by reference -+ instead of value. */ -+extern int cp_pass_by_reference (struct type *type); -+ - struct cp_abi_ops - { - const char *shortname; -@@ -162,6 +166,7 @@ struct cp_abi_ops - int *using_enc); - int (*baseclass_offset) (struct type *type, int index, char *valaddr, - CORE_ADDR address); -+ int (*pass_by_reference) (struct type *type); - }; - - -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.c -=================================================================== ---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/cp-abi.c 2003-11-26 17:04:00.000000000 -0500 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500 -@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - /* Generic code for supporting multiple C++ ABI's -- Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - - This file is part of GDB. - -@@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ value_rtti_type (struct value *v, int *f - return (*current_cp_abi.rtti_type) (v, full, top, using_enc); - } - -+int -+cp_pass_by_reference (struct type *type) -+{ -+ if ((current_cp_abi.pass_by_reference) == NULL) -+ return 0; -+ return (*current_cp_abi.pass_by_reference) (type); -+} -+ - /* Set the current C++ ABI to SHORT_NAME. */ - - static int -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c -=================================================================== ---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c 2004-03-15 15:38:08.000000000 -0500 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500 -@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ - /* Abstraction of GNU v3 abi. - Contributed by Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> - -- Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - - This file is part of GDB. - -@@ -419,6 +419,84 @@ gnuv3_baseclass_offset (struct type *typ - return base_offset; - } - -+/* Return nonzero if a type should be passed by reference. -+ -+ The rule in the v3 ABI document comes from section 3.1.1. If the -+ type has a non-trivial copy constructor or destructor, then the -+ caller must make a copy (by calling the copy constructor if there -+ is one or perform the copy itself otherwise), pass the address of -+ the copy, and then destroy the temporary (if necessary). -+ -+ For return values with non-trivial copy constructors or -+ destructors, space will be allocated in the caller, and a pointer -+ will be passed as the first argument (preceding "this"). -+ -+ We don't have a bulletproof mechanism for determining whether a -+ constructor or destructor is trivial. For GCC and DWARF2 debug -+ information, we can check the artificial flag. -+ -+ We don't do anything with the constructors or destructors yet, -+ but we have to get the argument passing right anyway. */ -+static int -+gnuv3_pass_by_reference (struct type *type) -+{ -+ int fieldnum, fieldelem, basenum; -+ -+ CHECK_TYPEDEF (type); -+ -+ /* We're only interested in things that can have methods. */ -+ if (TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_STRUCT -+ && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_CLASS -+ && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION) -+ return 0; -+ -+ for (fieldnum = 0; fieldnum < TYPE_NFN_FIELDS (type); fieldnum++) -+ for (fieldelem = 0; fieldelem < TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST_LENGTH (type, fieldnum); -+ fieldelem++) -+ { -+ struct fn_field *fn = TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST1 (type, fieldnum); -+ char *name = TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST_NAME (type, fieldnum); -+ struct type *fieldtype = TYPE_FN_FIELD_TYPE (fn, fieldelem); -+ -+ /* If this function is marked as artificial, it is compiler-generated, -+ and we assume it is trivial. */ -+ if (TYPE_FN_FIELD_ARTIFICIAL (fn, fieldelem)) -+ continue; -+ -+ /* If we've found a destructor, we must pass this by reference. */ -+ if (name[0] == '~') -+ return 1; -+ -+ /* If the mangled name of this method doesn't indicate that it -+ is a constructor, we're not interested. -+ -+ FIXME drow/2004-05-27: We could do this using the name of -+ the method and the name of the class instead of dealing -+ with the mangled name. We don't have a convenient function -+ to strip off both leading scope qualifiers and trailing -+ template arguments yet. */ -+ if (!is_constructor_name (TYPE_FN_FIELD_PHYSNAME (fn, fieldelem))) -+ continue; -+ -+ /* If this method takes two arguments, and the second argument is -+ a reference to this class, then it is a copy constructor. */ -+ if (TYPE_NFIELDS (fieldtype) == 2 -+ && TYPE_CODE (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (fieldtype, 1)) == TYPE_CODE_REF -+ && check_typedef (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (fieldtype, 1))) == type) -+ return 1; -+ } -+ -+ /* Even if all the constructors and destructors were artificial, one -+ of them may have invoked a non-artificial constructor or -+ destructor in a base class. If any base class needs to be passed -+ by reference, so does this class. */ -+ for (basenum = 0; basenum < TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); basenum++) -+ if (gnuv3_pass_by_reference (TYPE_BASECLASS (type, basenum))) -+ return 1; -+ -+ return 0; -+} -+ - static void - init_gnuv3_ops (void) - { -@@ -434,6 +512,7 @@ init_gnuv3_ops (void) - gnu_v3_abi_ops.rtti_type = gnuv3_rtti_type; - gnu_v3_abi_ops.virtual_fn_field = gnuv3_virtual_fn_field; - gnu_v3_abi_ops.baseclass_offset = gnuv3_baseclass_offset; -+ gnu_v3_abi_ops.pass_by_reference = gnuv3_pass_by_reference; - } - - extern initialize_file_ftype _initialize_gnu_v3_abi; /* -Wmissing-prototypes */ -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/hpacc-abi.c -=================================================================== ---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/hpacc-abi.c 2003-06-08 14:27:13.000000000 -0400 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/hpacc-abi.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500 -@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ - Most of the real code is from HP, i've just fiddled it to fit in - the C++ ABI abstraction framework. - -- Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - - This file is part of GDB. - -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/Makefile.in -=================================================================== ---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/Makefile.in 2004-11-10 12:30:06.000000000 -0500 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/Makefile.in 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500 -@@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@ ia64-tdep.o: ia64-tdep.c $(defs_h) $(inf - infcall.o: infcall.c $(defs_h) $(breakpoint_h) $(target_h) $(regcache_h) \ - $(inferior_h) $(gdb_assert_h) $(block_h) $(gdbcore_h) $(language_h) \ - $(objfiles_h) $(gdbcmd_h) $(command_h) $(gdb_string_h) $(infcall_h) \ -- $(dummy_frame_h) -+ $(dummy_frame_h) $(cp_abi_h) - inf-child.o: inf-child.c $(defs_h) $(regcache_h) $(memattr_h) $(symtab_h) \ - $(target_h) $(inferior_h) $(gdb_string_h) - infcmd.o: infcmd.c $(defs_h) $(gdb_string_h) $(symtab_h) $(gdbtypes_h) \ -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.exp -=================================================================== ---- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.exp 2004-11-11 09:48:00.498518899 -0500 -@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ -+# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger. -+ -+# Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ -+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify -+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by -+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or -+# (at your option) any later version. -+# -+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -+# GNU General Public License for more details. -+# -+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -+# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software -+# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. -+ -+# Check that GDB can call C++ functions whose parameters have -+# object type, but are passed by reference. -+ -+set testfile "pass-by-ref" -+set srcfile ${testfile}.cc -+set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile} -+if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } { -+ return -1 -+} -+ -+gdb_exit -+gdb_start -+gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir -+gdb_load ${binfile} -+ -+if ![runto_main] then { -+ return -1 -+} -+ -+gdb_test "print foo (global_obj)" " = 3" "call function" -Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.cc -=================================================================== ---- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 -+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.cc 2004-11-11 09:44:17.815014667 -0500 -@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ -+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger. -+ -+ Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ -+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify -+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by -+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or -+ (at your option) any later version. -+ -+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -+ GNU General Public License for more details. -+ -+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -+ along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software -+ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, -+ USA. */ -+ -+class Obj { -+public: -+ Obj (); -+ Obj (const Obj &); -+ ~Obj (); -+ int var[2]; -+}; -+ -+int foo (Obj arg) -+{ -+ return arg.var[0] + arg.var[1]; -+} -+ -+Obj::Obj () -+{ -+ var[0] = 1; -+ var[1] = 2; -+} -+ -+Obj::Obj (const Obj &obj) -+{ -+ var[0] = obj.var[0]; -+ var[1] = obj.var[1]; -+} -+ -+Obj::~Obj () -+{ -+ -+} -+ -+Obj global_obj; -+ -+int -+main () -+{ -+ int bar = foo (global_obj); -+ return bar; -+} |