summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/openwrt/toolchain/binutils/2.16.90.0.3/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'openwrt/toolchain/binutils/2.16.90.0.3/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch')
-rw-r--r--openwrt/toolchain/binutils/2.16.90.0.3/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch93
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/openwrt/toolchain/binutils/2.16.90.0.3/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch b/openwrt/toolchain/binutils/2.16.90.0.3/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9ef7a7c9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/openwrt/toolchain/binutils/2.16.90.0.3/702-binutils-skip-comments.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Retrieved from http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00646.html
+Fixes
+localealias.s:544: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
+when building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3
+
+Paths adjusted to match crosstool's patcher.
+
+Message-Id: m3n052qw2g.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de
+From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
+To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
+Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
+Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:27:19 +0200
+Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line
+
+Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:
+
+> Index: read.c
+> ===================================================================
+> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/read.c,v
+> retrieving revision 1.76
+> diff -c -3 -p -r1.76 read.c
+> *** read.c 12 Mar 2004 17:48:12 -0000 1.76
+> --- read.c 18 Mar 2004 09:56:05 -0000
+> *************** read_a_source_file (char *name)
+> *** 1053,1059 ****
+> #endif
+> input_line_pointer--;
+> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */
+> ! ignore_rest_of_line ();
+> }
+>
+> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook
+> --- 1053,1059 ----
+> #endif
+> input_line_pointer--;
+> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */
+> ! demand_empty_rest_of_line ();
+> }
+>
+> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook
+
+This means that the unknown character is no longer ignored, despite the
+comment. As a side effect a line starting with a line comment character
+not followed by APP in NO_APP mode now triggers an error instead of just a
+warning, breaking builds of glibc on m68k-linux. Earlier in
+read_a_source_file where #APP is handled there is another comment that
+claims that unknown comments are ignored, when in fact they aren't (only
+the initial line comment character is skipped).
+
+Note that the presence of #APP will mess up the line counters, but
+that appears to be difficult to fix.
+
+Andreas.
+
+2004-04-23 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
+
+ * read.c (read_a_source_file): Ignore unknown text after line
+ comment character. Fix misleading comment.
+
+--- binutils/gas/read.c.~1.78.~ 2004-04-23 08:58:23.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils/gas/read.c 2004-04-23 21:49:01.000000000 +0200
+@@ -950,10 +950,14 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name)
+ unsigned int new_length;
+ char *tmp_buf = 0;
+
+- bump_line_counters ();
+ s = input_line_pointer;
+ if (strncmp (s, "APP\n", 4))
+- continue; /* We ignore it */
++ {
++ /* We ignore it */
++ ignore_rest_of_line ();
++ continue;
++ }
++ bump_line_counters ();
+ s += 4;
+
+ sb_new (&sbuf);
+@@ -1052,7 +1056,7 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name)
+ continue;
+ #endif
+ input_line_pointer--;
+- /* Report unknown char as ignored. */
++ /* Report unknown char as error. */
+ demand_empty_rest_of_line ();
+ }
+
+
+--
+Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
+SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstra&#xC3;e 5, 90409 N&#xC3;rnberg, Germany
+Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
+"And now for something completely different."